Bankruptcy in Malaysia
-
Courtesy of: iMoney.my
http://www.imoney.my/articles/bankruptcy/?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=Traffic_MY_all_RSS
A reminder to update Picasa
-
*We just updated Picasa. To ensure that sharing to Google+ still works,
please update to the latest version or turn on automatic updates. Thanks,
and happy...
Picasa 3.9: Now with Google+ sharing and tagging
-
Posted by Chandrashekar Raghavan, Product Manager
Picasa 3.9, the latest update to the Picasa client, is ready for you to try
out! This update includes Goo...
FINE Country indeed >>>> SIMPLY Just ''great'' ...yes Greatness is in Appreciating plus Acknowledging ''what'' is better REALISTICALLY >>>> WHEN the student is READY will take a long, long time INDEED , ...And BEING Prepared is truly yet ''another'' thing ALTOGETHER Realistically >>>> Objects plus REJECTS indeed is truly not ACCEPTABLE, as to being ''willing'' to LISTEN ''or'' Learn in order to IMPROVE on the Present STATE of The UNION, Realistically ; .....JUST Like Federal Communications Commission officials announced plans Wednesday to fine AT&T $100 million for misleading subscribers about unlimited data plans. It’s the largest such fine the agency has ever proposed under rules that require broadband providers to clearly disclose information about their services to consumers.
On Wednesday, the FCC alleged AT&T’s practice of slowing the speeds of unlimited data plan users and failing to tell them that their speeds could be slower than other customers violated transparency obligations under the agency’s old net neutrality rules, which have been in effect since 2010.
(While a federal appeals court threw out most of the 2010 net neutrality rules last year, it upheld the section that requires Internet providers to clearly tell subscribers about data speeds and other details of their service.)
“Consumers deserve to get what they pay for,” said FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, in a prepared statement. “Broadband providers must be upfront and transparent about the services they provide.”
The FCC alleges AT&T violated the 2010 Open Internet rules by “falsely labeling these plans as ‘unlimited’ and by failing to sufficiently inform customers of the maximum speed they would receive” under the company’s new throttling policy, which was announced in 2011. The agency said it has received “thousands” of complaints from AT&T’s unlimited data plan customers since the policy took effect four years ago.
The Federal Trade Commission sued AT&T last year over the same issue, saying the company’s plan to cut subscriber speeds if they downloaded too much data during a billing cycle wasn’t clearly disclosed and violated the concept of having an “unlimited data” plan.
In a statement, AT&T said it will “vigorously dispute the FCC’s assertions.”
1 comment:
FINE Country indeed >>>> SIMPLY Just ''great'' ...yes Greatness is in Appreciating plus Acknowledging ''what'' is better REALISTICALLY >>>> WHEN the student is READY will take a long, long time INDEED , ...And BEING Prepared is truly yet ''another'' thing ALTOGETHER Realistically >>>> Objects plus REJECTS indeed is truly not ACCEPTABLE, as to being ''willing'' to LISTEN ''or'' Learn in order to IMPROVE on the Present STATE of The UNION, Realistically ; .....JUST Like Federal Communications Commission officials announced plans Wednesday to fine AT&T $100 million for misleading subscribers about unlimited data plans.
It’s the largest such fine the agency has ever proposed under rules that require broadband providers to clearly disclose information about their services to consumers.
On Wednesday, the FCC alleged AT&T’s practice of slowing the speeds of unlimited data plan users and failing to tell them that their speeds could be slower than other customers violated transparency obligations under the agency’s old net neutrality rules, which have been in effect since 2010.
(While a federal appeals court threw out most of the 2010 net neutrality rules last year, it upheld the section that requires Internet providers to clearly tell subscribers about data speeds and other details of their service.)
“Consumers deserve to get what they pay for,” said FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, in a prepared statement. “Broadband providers must be upfront and transparent about the services they provide.”
The FCC alleges AT&T violated the 2010 Open Internet rules by “falsely labeling these plans as ‘unlimited’ and by failing to sufficiently inform customers of the maximum speed they would receive” under the company’s new throttling policy, which was announced in 2011. The agency said it has received “thousands” of complaints from AT&T’s unlimited data plan customers since the policy took effect four years ago.
The Federal Trade Commission sued AT&T last year over the same issue, saying the company’s plan to cut subscriber speeds if they downloaded too much data during a billing cycle wasn’t clearly disclosed and violated the concept of having an “unlimited data” plan.
In a statement, AT&T said it will “vigorously dispute the FCC’s assertions.”
Post a Comment